The implications of the new era, defined by more global, widely accessible information, are also being felt in the world of financial investments. And there are clear repercussions for the industry. Access to investing has become increasingly widespread and straightforward, including in fixed income products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We are living in a data-driven world in which information has been democratised. As a result, a market such as fixed income\u2014once almost exclusively institutional\u2014is now far more accessible. One key enabler has been the emergence of fixed income ETFs. Although they currently account for just over 2% of the global fixed income market (reflecting its lower liquidity and trading volumes compared with equities) their impact has been significant. This is particularly evident given that, over the past two years, ETFs have attracted close to 50% of net new inflows into fixed income. Imagine the impact this could have on a market that is not especially liquid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 2022, the rise in interest rates by central banks, along with the resulting declines across fixed income markets, created a rare opportunity to gain exposure to the asset class. This ultimately made fixed income considerably more attractive than other risk assets. That window lasted for close to three years. With the wind at its back\u2014against a backdrop of falling rates and abundant liquidity\u2014almost any bond strategy delivered positive results. This period also coincided with the previously noted expansion of fixed income ETFs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, that environment of widespread gains has now come to an end. With inflation proving less contained\u2014partly due to the conflict in Iran, which has disrupted oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz\u2014and ongoing central bank volatility, the market has become more demanding and increasingly fragmented. Simply having exposure to the asset class is no longer sufficient. Today, success depends on active management and careful selection of issuers and duration in order to identify genuine value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Since 2023, the most effective strategy has been to not position for bond price appreciation, but simply to \u201cclip the coupon\u201d. Carry has been the primary driver of returns. Against this backdrop, funds investing in high yield, securitised assets and more flexible fixed income strategies have delivered the strongest performance. Following the compression of spreads across virtually all segments, greater selectivity is now required. Investors should look towards assets that are less correlated with the broader market \u201ctide\u201d. In this context, we see value in Nordic fixed income strategies, particularly in seeking diversification through Nordic high yield.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Specifically, Northern Europe\u2014home to around 27 million people across five countries\u2014accounts for approximately 6% of the EU\u2019s population, yet represents around 10% of its GDP. The region is home to global pioneers such as IKEA, Lego, Novo Nordisk, H&M, Spotify and Equinor, among others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These countries consistently rank among the global leaders in transparency, governance and anti-corruption. They also score highly in competitiveness rankings. They are characterised by political and social stability, as well as small, export-oriented economies. Their public finances are robust, with average government debt levels typically ranging between 30% and 40% of GDP. At the sovereign level, the main Nordic countries maintain AAA credit ratings. Norway is also home to the world\u2019s largest sovereign wealth fund, valued at approximately USD 1.8 trillion. Taken together, these factors underpin a strong perception of stability across the region.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nordic high yield offers an additional return premium(typically in the range of an extra 100-200 basis points) for comparable maturities and credit profiles within European credit. This reflects an opportunity to capture inefficiencies in non-euro-denominated issuance, as well as the more limited analyst coverage of unrated companies with nonetheless solid credit fundamentals. Part of this additional return is also driven by currency dynamics. Non-euro-denominated bonds tend to offer an additional yield of around 20-30 basis points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
These bonds also exhibit lower volatility, supported by the absence of passive investment flows, which can at times react indiscriminately. Moreover, most of these instruments are held by local institutional investors with a \u201cbuy and hold\u201d mindset. They also provide shorter duration without sacrificing returns, as maturities in these markets tend to be relatively short. Around 80% of the market consists of floating rate bonds, reducing interest rate sensitivity and overall volatility. Default rates are broadly in line with those seen in Europe, but with higher recovery rates. In addition, the region benefits from a strong ESG profile, as Nordic countries have long been pioneers in sustainability and corporate responsibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Finally, it is important not to overlook that this region carries a higher degree of liquidity risk. This is the market\u2019s \u201cAchilles\u2019 heel\u201d. As a market dominated by buy-and-hold investors, with very limited presence of ETFs or passive investment flows, liquidity can evaporate in periods of financial stress. Exiting a position quickly can prove costly in terms of spread.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is also important to consider the lack of formal credit ratings. Many companies are not rated by international agencies such as S&P and Moody\u2019s. This creates a degree of information asymmetry. While this contributes to the inefficiencies investors seek to exploit, it also requires significantly more in-depth proprietary credit analysis\u2014making the expertise and active management of experienced Nordic fixed income managers all the more critical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":13365,"template":"","categories":[479,666],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24032","opinion-article","type-opinion-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-research-en","category-financial-analysis"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/opinion-article\/24032","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/opinion-article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/opinion-article"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13365"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/creandgroup.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}